Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÅͳÎÇü 2±Þ¿Íµ¿ ÃæÀüÀçÀÇ Åº¼º°è¼ö¿Í Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ ¹× ¼öº¹Ä¡ÀÇ º¯¿¬À¶¼± ÆÄÀý°­µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

ELASTIC CONSTANTS, SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF TUNNEL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS AND MARGINAL RIDGE STRENGTH OF RESTORED TEETH

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1996³â 23±Ç 3È£ p.746 ~ 763
ÀÌ°¡¿¬, À±¿µ¼ö, ¹Ú¿µÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ°¡¿¬ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À±¿µ¼ö (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¿µÁØ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÀç·áÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
±³Çո鿡¼­ Á¢±ÙÇÏ¿© ÀÎÁ¢¸é Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½ÄºÎ Ãø±îÁö ¿ì½ÄºÎÀ§¸¸À» Æ÷ÇÔ½ÃÅ°´Â ÅͳÎÇü 2±Þ¿Íµ¿
¼öº¹ÀÇ °æ¿ì ¼öº¹Àç·áÀÇ ±â°èÀû »ó¼ö¿Í Ä¡Áú°úÀÇ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ °­µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ÅͳÎÇüÀ¸·Î ¼ö
º¹µÈ Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ º¯¿¬À¶¼± ÆÄÀýÀúÇ×¼º°úÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼º¸¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ º» ½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.
½ÇÇèÀç·á·Î´Â ResinomerR, Ketac-SilverR, Miracle
MixR ¹× TytinRÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢ ¼öº¹Àç·áÀÇ ±â°èÀû ¹°¼ºÄ¡
´Â ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ÃøÁ¤¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢ Àç·á´ç 3°³¾¿ÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿© Young's modulus¿Í
bulk modulus¸¦ ±¸ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
»ó¾ÆÁú ¸é°ú ÃæÀüÀç·á°£ÀÇ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ´Â °¢ ¼öº¹¿ë Àç·á¿¡ »óÀÀÇÑ »ó¾ÆÁú Àü󸮸¦ Çà
ÇÏ¿© ¼öº¹Àç·á¸¦ »ó¾ÆÁú¿¡ ºÎÂøÇÏ°í, 400ȸÀÇ thermocyclingÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ÈÄ °¢ ¼öº¹Àç·áÀÇ Á¾
·ù¿¡ µû¶ó ºÐ·ùµÈ Resinomer±º, Ketac-Silver±º, Miracle Mix±º ¹× Tytin±º¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¸¸´É¹°
¼º½ÃÇè±â¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢ ±º´ç 10°³¾¿ÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
º¯¿¬À¶¼±ÀÇ ÆÄÀý°­µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤Çϱâ À§ÇØ ¹ß°ÅµÈ °ÇÀüÇÑ 60°³ÀÇ ´ë±¸Ä¡¸¦ Å©±â¸¦ ºÐ»ê½ÃÄÑ 6
±ºÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥, Control±ºÀº ¿Íµ¿ Çü¼ºÀ» ÀüÇô ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ±º, Unrestored±ºÀº ÅͳÎÇü ¿Íµ¿
Çü¼ºÀ» ÇÏ°í ¼öº¹Àç·áÀÇ ÃæÀüÀ» ÇàÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ±º, ³ª¸ÓÁö 4±ºÀº Çü¼ºµÈ ¿Íµ¿¿¡ ¼öº¹ÇÏ´Â Àç
·á¿¡ µû¶ó Resinomer±º, Ketac-Silver±º, Miracle Mix±º ¹× Tytin±ºÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿Íµ¿Çü¼º
½Ã ±³ÇÕ¸é Á¢±ÙÀº ÃÖ¼Ò 2mmÀÇ °ÇÀüÇÑ º¯¿¬À¶¼±ÀÌ ÀÜÁ¸Çϵµ·Ï ÇàÇÏ°í, ÀÎÁ¢¸éÀÇ Ãⱸ°¡ º¯
¿¬À¶¼± ¾à 2.5mmÇϹ濡 À§Ä¡Çϵµ·Ï # ¨ö, 2, 4 round bur¸¦ Â÷·Ê·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÅͳÎÇü ¿Íµ¿À»
Çü¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ±ºÀÇ ½ÃÇèÆíÀ» 400ȸ thermocyclingÇÑ ÈÄ ¸¸´É¹°¼º½ÃÇè±â¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© º¯¿¬
À¶¼±ÀÇ ÆÄÀý°­µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Young's modulus´Â TytinRÀÌ 63.95 GPa·Î ´Ù¸¥ ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô
Àº °ªÀ» º¸¿´°í, ±× ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î´Â Ketac-Silver 27.60 GPa, Miracle MixR 18.48
GPa, ResinomerR 10.74 GPaÀÇ ¼øÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç °¢ Àç·á°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù
(P<0.05). ¶ÇÇÑ, bulk modulusÀÇ Å©±â´Â Young's modulus¿Í °°Àº Å©±â ¼øÀ¸·Î
TytinRÀÌ 59.57 GPa, Ketac-Silver 23.57 GPa, Miracle MixR
12.50 GPa, ResinomerR 11.60 GPaÀÇ °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
2. »ó¾ÆÁú¸é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ´Â Resinomer±ºÀÌ 7.41 MPa·Î 1.80MPaÀÎ Ketac-Silver
±º°ú 2.84 MPaÀÎ Miracle Mix±º¿¡ ºñÇؼ­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Å« °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(P<0.01). ÇÑÆí Tytin±º
Àº thermocyclingµ¿¾È¿¡ ¼öº¹Àç°¡ »ó¾ÆÁú¸éÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ Å»¶ôµÇ¾î Ä¡¾Æ³»¿¡¼­ÀÇ À¯Áö·ÂÀº Ä¡Áú
°úÀÇ ±â°èÀûÀÎ °áÇÕ¿¡¸¸ ±â´ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
3. Control±ºÀÇ º¯¿¬À¶¼± ÆÄÀý°­µµÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀº 84.24kgf À̾úÀ¸³ª, Unrestored±ºÀº
46.14kgf·Î ¿Íµ¿Çü¼º¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °­µµ°¡ ÇöÀúÈ÷ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù(P<0.01). ±×·¯³ª ÅͳÎÇü ¿Íµ¿¿¡ °¢
¼öº¹Àç·á·Î ÃæÀü ÈÄ Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ º¯¿¬À¶¼±°­µµ´Â Ketac-Silver±º 74.06kgf, Miracle Mix±º
73.36kgf, Resinomer±º 63.47kgf ¼øÀ¸·Î¼­ Control±º°ú ºñ½ÁÇÑ °­µµ·Î ȸº¹µÇ¾úÀ¸³ª(P>0.05),
Tytin±ºÀº 58.76kgf·Î Control±º¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·Àº °­µµ¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(P<0.05).
ÀÌ»óÀÇ ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ º¸Á¸ÀûÀÎ ÅͳÎÇü ¿Íµ¿Çü¼º ÈÄ Ketac-SilverR, Miracle
MixR ¹× ResinomerR¸¦ »ç¿ëÇØ ¼öº¹ÇÑ ÈÄ¿¡´Â º¯¿¬À¶¼±ÀÇ ÆÄÀý
°­µµ°¡ °ÇÀüÄ¡¿Í ºñ½ÁÇÑ °­µµ¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÅÍ³Î½Ä ¿Íµ¿ ¼öº¹¿¡ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¼öº¹Àç·á´Â Ä¡Áú¿¡
´ëÇØ ³ôÀº °áÇÕ·ÂÀ» °®À¸¸é¼­ ź¼º°è¼ö´Â Ä¡ÁúÀÇ Åº¼º°è¼ö º¸´Ù ³·Áö ¾ÊÀ» ¶§ º¯¿¬À¶¼±ÀÇ
°­µµ°¡ ȸº¹µÊÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
An alternative design to conventional class ¥± cavity preparation for proximal carious
lesions is the tunnel preparation. It preserves the marginal ridge intact, thus making it
possible to maintain the natural contact relationship with the adjacent tooth and
minimize tooth reduction.
This in vitro study was purposed to evaluate the effect of the materials' elastic
constants and shear-bond strength on the marginal ridge fracture resistance of teeth
restored by the tunnel technique, and to find the materials of choice for tunnel
restorations.
ResinomerR, Ketac-silverR, Miracle-MixR,
and Tytin were used as restorative material.
The elastic constants of each restorative material were evaluated by ultrasonic pulse
measurement. Young's modulus and bulk modulus of the restorative materials were
evaluated in three specimens for each material type.
The shear-bond strength of the restorative materials to the dentin surface was
measured after thermocycling 400 times between 6 and 60¡É, using ten specimens for
each material type.
For measuring marginal ridge strength, 60 sound extracted molar teeth were
distributed into six groups by size. Sound molar teeth were used as a Control group
and unfilled prepared teeth were grouped as Unrestored. Another four groups were
named Resinomer group, Ketac-Silver group, Miracle Mix group, and Tytin group by
type of restorative material. Tunnel cavity preparation was done with # ¨ö, 2, and 4
round burs in sequence. Initial access to proximal surface was made through an occlusal
access preparation started at least 2mm from the marginal ridge, and the proximal
opening was formed about 2.5mm below the marginal ridge. After restoration and
thermocycling, marginal ridge strength was measured using a universal testing machine.
The results wre as follows :
1. The Young's modulus of TytinR was 63.95 GPa, followed by
Ketac-SilverR 27.60 GPa, Miracle-mixR 18.48 GPa, and
ResinomerR 10.74 GPa showing significant differences between the groups
(P<0.05). The bulk modulus of the materials showed the same order as Young's
modulus. The value of TytinR showed 59.57 GPa indicating that it will
deform less than other materials under the same stress. It was followed by
Ketac-SilverR 23.57 GPa, Miracle MixR 12.50 GPa, and
ResinomerR 11.60 GPa.
2. The Resinomer group had a shear-bond strength of 7.41 MPa which was
significantly higher than those of the Ketac-Silver group (1.80 MPa) and the Miracle
Mix group (2.84 MPa) (P<0.01). All the specimens of Tytin group detatched from the
dentin surface during thermocycling.
3. The mean marginal ridge strength of the Unrestored group (46.14 kgf) was
significantly lower than that of the control group (84.24 kgf) (P<0.01). The marginal
ridge strength of teeth restored by the tunnel technique was, in order, Ketac-Silver
group 74.06 kgf, Miracle Mix group 73.36 kgf, Resinomer group 63.47 kgf, and Tytin
group 58.76 kgf. The Ketac-Silver, Miracle Mix, and Resinomer groups showed no
significant difference with the Control group(P>0.05), but the Tytin group showed
significantly lower strength compared to the Control group(P<0.05).
The results showed that the marginal ridge strength of the teeth restored by the
tunnel technique was not significantly lower than that of sound teeth. They also
demonstrated that the bonding strength of the restorative material to the tooth surface
should be high and the modulus of elasticity should not be lower than that of the tooth
in order to restore the marginal ridge strength to its natural condition.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI